physics

I think in terms of logic, reason, and advanced, sometimes not visible empiricism.


Also, the view that if something does not make sense on consideration, yet others claim it does make sense to them while still unable to explain it sensibly...Why, the likelihood of it being a crock becomes ever greater, not less, when more people make the claim they understand it, yet are unable to explain it. My view is then a new concept set is required.


So, to me, it would seem there is not a line that separates bosonic fields from fermionic particles. The Fermions appear more to be tiny and discrete boson fields. Fermions can be viewed as concentrated and dimensionally limited Bosons.



But that there is much more to this than what I just said. An exceedingly tiny local energy of perhaps pure C^2 that does move in a limited distance, that distance being the fermion's diameter, at light speed. The size of this piece of energy is very much smaller than the diameter it travels back and forth, creating a sphere like appearance, if possible to be viewed, because it does not repeat its previous vector. And, that the understanding of the various routes it may traverse as types, is the appearance of various spin characteristics.



To understand how a fermion works, is actually to understand how a tiny and limited boson works. But the grasp of fermion characters also includes how fermions react with other fermions. One set of these reactions being about how they combine to produce quarks, in particular, the various quark types.



And therefore, to understand fermions more fully, one must also understand the various quark types and systems. It is possible at this stage of understanding that discussions of light, gravity, small force, and large force can be considered, as how they relate to each other. Small force must have been a consideration about the Transformation of fermion to boson...in its further space and time dimensions that may be applicable only to such tiny distances.



Interfaces of the limits of one set of dimensions to and with another set of dimensions is likely one major source of confusion regarding the topology of a spreading, expanding boson.



This is good cause for pause.



Curious about that ORCID. Also, I believe I ran across this site years ago. But a persistent digital identifier sounds both good, and slightly ominous.