Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- <Mandarinka> heh, I thought now with AVX2 I should be able to test Rav1e's --speed 0
- <Mandarinka> nah, rav1e just is slow... as expected I guess
- <Mandarinka> also "<TD-Linux> I posit that rav1e already beats x264 at every bitrate" kinda got me into hold my beer mood
- <Mandarinka> ugh, one more day to finisth the Rav1e test
- <Mandarinka> since Rav1e was 0.005 fps, only fair to go all out on x264 too
- <Mandarinka> Rav1e beating x264 (at 14.5megabits) = nope
- <Mandarinka> yeah, the images with the dust storm has Rav1e work well
- <Mandarinka> lol, so the reason why I got such an abysmall speed from Rav1e was.... assembly is disabled on Windows.
- <Mandarinka> wm4: https://github.com/xiph/rav1e/blob/master/build.rs#L25 --- doesn't seem any reason is given there/in a comment
- <wm4> Mandarinka: compared to what does rav1e fail? x386 or aom
- <Chagall> rav1e is supposedly better than x264 now, I think? and tiling was just added so speed is not great but it is more reasonable than old av1 benchmarks
- <maddo> rav1e is nowhere near quality and feature wise yet
- <Chagall> there is a basic psy-optimized mode in rav1e but I have no idea how it's implemented
- <Daemon404> rav1e has very basic psy, as above
- <Arwen> < Chagall> rav1e is supposedly better than x264 now <-- probably not for real videos
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement