Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Stargaze Bridge Notes:
- some are centralized, some are less centralized, no perfect bridge only pros and cons
- prefered solution for dev is different bridge for each eco-system, this avoids the con
- of having different types of bridges i.e. grav-eth.
- Wormhole is known for bridging selana, no active bridge for osmo or atom
- people want to bridge from eth to Atom.
- don't need one bridge for everything, more like one bridge per token
- bridge for stargaze: planning on being Grav they like the decentralization.
- they like that grav is a small and nimble team, very active.
- overall experience with Grav: very active support, helpful community, lots of teams forking
- how do we get NFT's over to Stargaze, Grav wants to be a one stop shop, an Omnibridge
- Axelar is way expensive, $134 base transaction fee.
- Upgradeable contract opens things to security flaws.
- about when can we expect the bridge: a little bit after the marketplace, a month or 2?
- May or June then
- preserves all metadata and mints an equivalent NFT on the Stargaze side.
- sent to the bridge, locks it, mints an equivalent. to get it out it is burned on the
- stargaze side and is released.
- a vote will go out, we don't know for sure who is going to be the next bridge for osmosis
- when it is wrapped it does not necessarily have the same ownership, ideally there is
- an nft standard where one NFT is recognized across all chains, if your NFT is being
- held then it does not necessarily belong to you.
- nothing will be on a centralized exchange, maybe junoswap pool.
- Stargaze can be sent to the etherium side, and they become an etherium wrapped stargaze
- it's so new you can't really do anything with it.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement