Stoners never win

Got kicked from there for saying NUT is egotistical for saying I'm cringy because I said I could use another bowl after I messed up saying I got too high when someone was wondering why I was typing like a drunk person, and then they gaslit me saying "don't complain going on the internet and then complaining about egoistic people online" I'm just like wtf the problem isn't me going on the internet the problem is Nut not apologizing because he thinks it's okay to call people cringy for no good reason (someone saying they're not TOO high) yes all for assuring someone I didn't get as high as I first insinuated, and it mattered to me saying I could still get high so don't think I'm THAT high, but no, I'm "cringy" for explaining I'm not that high but I'm high enough to type like an 11 year old.

And then they said 16 year olds aren't allowed here. I'm 20. What the fuck is up with this gatekeeping bullshit. At this point what is "cringy" is me taking it this far (not letting this slip by) because I say I want a bowl because someone was wondering how intoxicated I was, so for me to say I'm TOO high shows them I'm irresponsible but I was not TOO HIGH so I HAD to say I could use another bowl to transmit the idea that I'm not high out of my mind (to prevent being made fun of as an irresponsible stoner) in my pursuit to portray myself as not a heavy stoner (saying I got too high even though I didn't and then correcting myself saying I could still use a bowl, I messed up, because saying I could still use a bowl showed them I am a stoner and for that they judged me by wrongfully because I wasn't showing off, I was just saying I'm not that high and could use a bowl, and he said it's "stoner virtue signaling" and he said he "cringed" at ME, for answering someone's question as to whether I am 11 yrs old or just intoxicated, so I said nah I'm just TOO HIGH and then I corrected myself, but in correcting myself, I lost.

Stoners can never win. They can't talk about how much they love weed without being put down for it, and they always have to watch out for stereotypes that they want to avoid like being brandished a good for nothing stoner, or someone who thinks they're cool just because they're talking about weed, like nah dude, I want to be able to freely express my tastes and tell people I could use a bowl because I'm not that high because they were wondering how intoxicated I was, and I got banned from a server for saying someone was egoistic for saying I'm cringy for saying I could use a bowl, stoners can never win

Imagine this, someone was wondering how intoxicated I was so to me it matters telling them how fucked up I was because it matters answering someone's question FAITHFULLY (TRUTHFULLY) It's the truth I am not too high (I already messed up saying I got too high) so what do I do? Edit the comment and take out the too, or say the truth and say NVM I could still use a bowl because I'm not THAT high?

Someone asked me if I'm 11 years old or intoxicated (I was typing weird because I was hungover) and I said I'm too high but not that high (also drunk, but not alcohol virtual signalling) because I could use a bowl still because telling people I'm too high shows people I'm irresponsible and a bad stoner (unable to handle their habits) so it's worse leaving it at "too high" to start with but I added "Nah, not too high I could use a bowl still" to fix my irresponsible stoner image but what do I do? Nothing, stoners never win, they are judged.