DearElectors.txt

Copy of what I sent via http://asktheelectors.org/
Subject: I'd Like to Voice My Concerns (Cabinet Picks are Bad, Missile
 Crisis, Clinton server )
Date: December 18, 2016 10:41:46 PM EST


Dear Electors.  I am very concerned about Trump's presidency, what it will do
for the nation, and what it will do for the world.  Let me say, I voted for
Clinton, and I had some anxieties about Trump, now since Election Night they
have become significant fears, not only will America no longer lead, I feel
he will make mistakes, that will alienate China from us, but also Japan,
other democracies, and basically destabilize the east.  I feel he will make
mistakes that will encourage an already emboldened Putin to grab for more in
Europe, or possibly, Ukraine, or possibly Japan, and yes, possibly, China, and
I feel he that he will feel that the mistake won't be  a mistake because he
respond with nuclear brinksmanship.  Has Trump picked the right cabinet to
assist him some future "Cuban Missle Crisis?"  Hasn't  Trump actually
picked people who listen to him, and might heed his advice, instead of the
other way around?  In business you can almost always decide to delay when
you're unsure, as President, you can't.  Our military will need him to be
on the ball, because our military won't be able to act without his order.
If you deprive Trump of an electoral majority, then the House decides the
the President, and the Senate the Vice-President.  I don't think they
have to be sequestered, leadership from both houses can discuss things.
History provides some examples of what can happen.  In one case I believe
the House took someone from the VP slot and made President, and the Senate
made some who on top of a ticket, Vice-President -- I admit I'm not 100%
sure if I remembering that right, but I feel the logic of the law would
infact allow Congress to produce a Pence, Sanders outcome, but at anyrate
I believe that Congress had signficant 3rd (or even 4th) party represenation
and had to form a coalition to decide the issue, in both houses. Another,
example from history that I'm sure I remember better, was a case where
Congressional leadership forced the the president elect to drop four
cabinet picks for their picks -- AND, that is what I hoping can happen.

I could also go into the Clinton Email Server Scandal, and the Russian
Hacking, but the hour grows late.   I will say I'm convinced there was
a requirement that the server be "AirGap'ed" and basically the developer
Clinton got simply wasn't up to the job, and really it's not a 1 person
job, it's not a configure and forget thing.   In short, it's a way, among
other things, to insure you can a completely accurate packet-log for
all incoming and outgoing internet traffic, for a sub-net. (A subnet can
just include 1 server), it's a sure-thing, because the the server
that provides the "AirGap" is not only a packet logger, packet filter
firewall, it also functions as the the router/ and gateway address for the
protected sub-net.  So, the server was always in violation, and admitting
the requirement to Congress, would make Clinton in violation.  If I had
any doubts that I have should have doubts, they vanished completely
when Trump was almost "singing her praises", when he he admitted he wouldn't
be proceeding with prosectutions, after one security briefing.  Also,
how many of those on Twitter still saying "Lock her up!" could be paid
russian bloggers? Lastly, "AirGap" is the future,  and to make it work
you need professionals, that you keep employed, you can't replace it
with robots.